Skip to main content

Review: Mr. Darcy Takes a Wife, by Linda Berdoll

I read this book with a little bit of skepticism, since I've mentioned recently that I'm not a fan of Pride and Prejudice spin-offs. After all, how could anything ever match up? However, I'm interested in how other people think the story should continue (if at all), and so I picked this book up. There were many things that were wrong with this book, not the least of which was the stilted language the author used. Believe me, this is even worse than Mr. Darcy's Daughters.

The book opens in a carriage. Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth Bennet have just gotten married, and Mr. Darcy is laughably preoccupied with the comfort of his wife's "nether end." For the next two hundred pages or so, the author concerns herself with the conjugal activities of the couple. Some readers have suggested here that the book is rather like porn; soft-core porn, as a matter of fact. Based on the original, I would have expected the Darcys to have had a passionate marriage; but not to the extent described in this book.

Aside from the sexual exploits of Mr. and Mrs. Darcy, I really couldn't find any major flaws in the plot- probably the only redeeming feature of this book. The author, it seems, is a great writer. Mrs. Bardoll could have written such a great book; but only if she hadn't chosen to write a "sequel" to a wonderful, much-loved classic!

The plot concerns many things: the parental identity of a groom who lives on the Pemberly estate; the literary aspersions of Georgiana Darcy; the marital felicity of Jane and Charles Bingly (which is not as happy as one would have supposed); the marital felicity of George and Lydia Wickham (which, to no one's surprise, is nonexistant); and the doings of a roguish footman who wiggles his way into the middle of the Darcy family. Mr. Collins makes an appearance here, and he is much more hapless than Jane Austen depicted him; there's one rather hilarious scene in which he falls off a horse.

Anyone who has read Pride and Prejudice several, or many times, will have prejudices of what the characters should be like. Mrs. Bardoll's opinion is only one of many. But Mrs. Bardoll bases her novel on the 1995 BBC adaptation of the book, instead of the book itself; and therin lies her problem. The author is too concerned with an image she gained from watching the miniseries, the actors involved, etc. The author also claims that she did years of research for this book; as a result, her book is convoluted with references to historical issues and doesn't focus upon what Jane Austen would have focused upon.


Danielle said…
I can't do sequels to famous books either. And I can't imagine romantic liaisons between the Darcys either. Not to be too prim and proper, but it's just a little too strange for me.
Anonymous said…
I've looked at these Jane Austen sequels, but I've never really felt drawn to read them and now I'm glad. I haven't read any of the sequels to Gone with the Wind, either. If the original author didn't write them, I'm not interested. I prefer my own imagination.
Anonymous said…
I don't really read Jane sequels because they are just so different from the magic that I love from her books, but I read this about 4 or 5 years ago. I worked at a magazine publishing company and they sent a galley over. The sex was little over the top, but I thought the plots were plausible and interesting if a little melodramatic at times. In the end the sheer number of plots got to me, and it got a little long but it wasn't as bad as I expected. Of course I never read another sequel either.
Anna Claire said…
I'm with Nicole. It seems like Berdoll tried to do too much with this book--too many subplots. And it was weird that about a gajillion sex scenes are in the first part, and then practically none in the second. I'm not saying I want more sex scenes in the book, but you'd think if she was going to do that many, she'd have spaced them out a bit.

Oh, and she was unfair to Jane and Bingley. There, I said it.

For those who don't like sequels to famous books (me either) but want another Austen fix, check out Austenland. It's bizarre but so, so funny and true.
Anonymous said…
I just finished Pride and Prejudice and am very happy with the consummation. Why should anyone bother with spin-off? Conjugal activity? *This* is scary. I have stumbled upon a few P&P sequels but to be honest not keen on them.

Just leave the Darcys alone I say!
Anonymous said…
I had a used copy of this on my book shelf for years--hadn't picked it up (too much good stuff out there to read!). I had heard about the soft core porn aspect and recently when attempting to purge my bookshelf(no easy task!), my unread copy was the first thing to go--I never even cracked the binding, and I am glad now!

Popular posts from this blog

Read in 2017

January: 1. London: the Novel, by Edward Rutherfurd 2. Notes from a Small Island, by Bill Bryson 3. A Very English Scandal, by John Preston 4. Imagined London, by Anna Quindlen 5. The Black Dahlia, by James Ellroy 6. In Cold Blood, by Truman Capote February 1. Sense and Sensibility, by Jane Austen 2. The Girls of Slender Means, by Muriel Spark 3. Patience, by John Coates 4. Into the Whirlwind, by Eugenia Ginzburg 5. The Turn of the Screw, by Henry James 6. Few Eggs and No Oranges, by Vere Hodgson 7. Vittoria Cottage, by DE Stevenson March: 1. The Exiles Return, by Elizabeth de Waal 2. Northanger Abbey, by Jane Austen 3. The Death of the Heart, by Elizabeth Bowen 4. The Buccaneers, by Edith Wharton 5. The Death of the Heart, by Elizabeth Bowen 6. White Teeth, by Zadie Smith April: 1. The Heat of the Day, by Elizabeth Bowen 2. The Two Mrs. Abbotts, by DE Stevenson 3. The Road to Little Dribbling, by Bill Bryson May: 1. London War Notes, by Mollie Panter-Dow

Review: Jane Austen's Letters, ed. by Deirdre Le Faye

Pages: 667 Original date of publication: 2011 My copy:   2011 (Oxford University Press) Why I decided to read: How I acquired my copy:, April 2013 This is a compilation of many of Jane Austen’s letters, most of them sent to her sister Cassandra between 1796 and 1817, the year of her death. Although many of Austen’s letters were destroyed by her sister in order to preserve the family reputation, the collection contains over 160 letters in which Austen gives her sister details about her life in Chawton—as well as giving us a tantalizing glimpse of what was going through her mind as she was writing her novels (especially the novel that was to become Pride and Prejudice , First Impressions ). There are other letters here, too, giving advice to her niece and professional correspondence to publishers—as well as a couple of letters that were written by Cassandra Austen after Jane’s death. To the sisters, the letters acted in the way that phone calls do today; A

Review: The Far Cry, by Emma Smith

Pages: 324 Original date of publication: 1949 My edition: 2007 (Persephone) Why I decided to read: It’s been on my TBR pile since I purchased it six months ago How I acquired my copy: from the Persephone shop, September 2009 The Far Cry was inspired by the author’s experiences in India. In 1945, at the age of 21, Emma Smith (who describes herself as “a green young woman” in her preface to this edition) traveled to India with a film production crew as a junior script writer/gopher. While she was there, Smith kept a journal of her experiences and thoughts to detail her “magical Cinderella-like transformation” into a worldlier person. In the preface of the novel, Emma Smith writes brilliantly about what kind of impact her travels to India had upon her, a first-time visitor. What she wrote in her journal went largely into the writing of this novel; and the stronger it is for it, I think, because this is an absolutely stunning book. When Mr. Digby’s ex wife returns from Amer