Skip to main content

Review: Jane Austen's Letters, ed. by Deirdre Le Faye


Pages: 667
Original date of publication: 2011
My copy:  2011 (Oxford University Press)
Why I decided to read:
How I acquired my copy: Amazon.com, April 2013

This is a compilation of many of Jane Austen’s letters, most of them sent to her sister Cassandra between 1796 and 1817, the year of her death. Although many of Austen’s letters were destroyed by her sister in order to preserve the family reputation, the collection contains over 160 letters in which Austen gives her sister details about her life in Chawton—as well as giving us a tantalizing glimpse of what was going through her mind as she was writing her novels (especially the novel that was to become Pride and Prejudice, First Impressions). There are other letters here, too, giving advice to her niece and professional correspondence to publishers—as well as a couple of letters that were written by Cassandra Austen after Jane’s death.

To the sisters, the letters acted in the way that phone calls do today; Austen’s news is all about people who lived in her neighborhood, the balls she went to, who wore what, etc. So you really get a sense that she was honing her observations skills in order to write her novels. Austen’s wit is sometimes caustic; she doesn’t always have the nicest things to say about people; but she had an eye for detail that would serve her well later on. It’s clear from Austen’s letters that she was nervous about putting her work out in the world, but she tried to cover it up by being self-deprecating. One of the things I like about people is the ability to laugh at themselves, and Austen does it here well.

About half the book is letters; the other half is notes on the letters (including information about postmarks), a glossary of the people mentioned in them and the places that Austen went to, and so on. There’s so much information packed into the back of the book about the letters that I had to keep flipping back to the end of it in order to get context (for that reason, I wish that the notes on the letters had been placed within the letters so that they could have been more easily referenced). Despite my minor problem with the way this collection is laid out, I really enjoyed reading it; it gives the reader, especially the Jane Austen aficionado, a glimpse into the life and mind of one of the English language’s greatest writers.


Comments

Unknown said…
I think you've written a good analysis of Austin's letters. How did you manage to find them online? I can't find them at Amazon. It says the link doesn't exist..
Margaret Stone's page - www.au.essay-writing-place.com
Sukana Murtaja said…

Excellent post! I think this would be nice and helpful to others. Thanks


poster printing

Interior Printing
Abdur Rahim said…

It 's amazing article and useful.. Thanks

Server 2016 Migration Experts

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Wuthering Heights, by Emily Bronte

Pages: 315 Original date of publication: 1847 My edition: 1981 (Bantam Classics) Why I decided to read: Re-read; first read summer 2002 How I acquired my copy: Barnes and Noble, summer 2002 I first read this in 2002, when I did an internship in Chicago and went on a classics reading kick that summer, and this book was one of them ( Vanity Fair and Bleak House were two of the “loose baggy monsters” I read that summer). Although I’d read Charlotte’s Jane Eyre several times in school, Wuthering Heights was, for some reason, never on any of the syllabi for any of the classes I took (and English was my major!). Wuthering Heights is a complicated novel, and it probably says a lot about Emily Bronte herself. The novel is melodramatic at times, and it contains two narrators: an old former family servant and a near neighbor, neither of whom is an observant or reliable narrator (at the beginning of the book, Mr. Lockwood thinks that a pile of dead rabbits is a cat). Emily Bronte had a w

Read in 2017

January: 1. London: the Novel, by Edward Rutherfurd 2. Notes from a Small Island, by Bill Bryson 3. A Very English Scandal, by John Preston 4. Imagined London, by Anna Quindlen 5. The Black Dahlia, by James Ellroy 6. In Cold Blood, by Truman Capote February 1. Sense and Sensibility, by Jane Austen 2. The Girls of Slender Means, by Muriel Spark 3. Patience, by John Coates 4. Into the Whirlwind, by Eugenia Ginzburg 5. The Turn of the Screw, by Henry James 6. Few Eggs and No Oranges, by Vere Hodgson 7. Vittoria Cottage, by DE Stevenson March: 1. The Exiles Return, by Elizabeth de Waal 2. Northanger Abbey, by Jane Austen 3. The Death of the Heart, by Elizabeth Bowen 4. The Buccaneers, by Edith Wharton 5. The Death of the Heart, by Elizabeth Bowen 6. White Teeth, by Zadie Smith April: 1. The Heat of the Day, by Elizabeth Bowen 2. The Two Mrs. Abbotts, by DE Stevenson 3. The Road to Little Dribbling, by Bill Bryson May: 1. London War Notes, by Mollie Panter-Dow

Review: The Persephone Book of Short Stories

Pages: 473 Original date of publication: 1909-1986 My copy: 2012 (Persephone) Why I decided to read: How I acquired my copy: Persephone subscription, January 2013 The Persephone Book of Short Stories is a collection of thirty short stories—some that have been previously published in other Persephone books (crowd pleasers such as Minnie Panter-Downes’s “Good Evening, Mrs Craven” and Irene Nemirovsky’s “Dimanche”)—some that have been published in the Persephone Post , and others that appear here for the first time. The earliest story in the collection, Susan Glaspell’s“A to Z,” was published in 1909 and the last, Georgina Hammick’s “A Few Cases in the Day Case Unit,” in 1986. My favorite story in the collection is the first: Susan Glaspell’s “A to Z,’ in which a young college graduate gets a job as a dictionary copyist at a publisher’s office. She strikes up a friendship with a young man at the office; the irony of the story being that while these characters’ bread