Skip to main content

Review: They Were Sisters, by Dorothy Whipple


Pages: 455

Original date of publication: 1943

My edition: 2007 (Persephone)

Why I decided to read: browsing on Persephone’s website

How I acquired my copy: From the LCS shop, September 2009

“….they were sisters and loved each other, no matter how deeply the circumstances o

f their lives seemed to divide them.” (p. 138).

This is the story of three sisters, as different as three people could ever be. Charlotte marries Geoffrey, who’s not good enough for her; Vera marries Brian, she she’s not good enough for; and Lucy, the eldest of the three Field sisters, marries a man with whom she’s completely compatible. They each lie separate lives in separate parts of the country, but what brings them together, as the quote above shows, is their love for one another—and the children, who are visibly affected by the breakdown of two marriages. Happiness—the having or not having of it—is a strong theme in this book.

This novel had a strong impact on me. Geoffrey’s abusive behavior towards Charlotte never actually descends into the physical; but it’s the psychological aspect of it that really chills the reader to the bone (the scene with the dog especially left a bad taste in my mouth about him). It’s a textbook abusive relationship, with Charlotte constantly making excuses for her husband, the children cowering in fear of what he will think, say, or do. At the same time, Whipple manages to make her reader see things from Geoffrey’s point of view: what it all comes down to is that Geoffrey is an overgrown bully, extraordinarily selfish and unable to see other people be happy. He's insensitive, too; so much so that he actually laughs at Lucy when she expresses concern over Charlotte's drinking and drug-taking. It's interesting how each of his children reacts to him in a different way: one submits meekly, one rebels violently against him and runs away, and the third eventually ends up happy, with a little help from the people who care about her. My only complaint against the book is that Geoffrey doesn’t really get what he deserves in the end; but I suppose that the way in which Whipple wrote the story is more realistic, and serves to illustrate how the men have all the power in cases such as these.

Vera and Brian’s marriage is nearly the exact same as Geoffrey and Charlotte’s, except in reverse. Bored with her marriage, Vera turns to other people to cope; she’s is just a selfish as Geoffrey was, and it’s her selfishness that destroys her marriage and leads her daughter to resent her. One of the big themes of this book is how the behavior of adults impacts children; nowhere is this more true than in the case of Judith and Sarah, who seem adrift with parents who are unfit to raise them. It’s not surprising that they should find comfort in one another and in their Aunt Lucy, the most levelheaded and happy of the three older women.

Dorothy Whipple’s writing style has been described over and over again as “readable;” They Were Sisters is easily one of Whipple’s most readable books. The plot takes a back seat to the writing and the character descriptions, which are first rate. This is definitely a book worth thinking about, and one I enjoyed immensely.


This is Persephone no. 56. Endpaper below:

Comments

tea lady said…
You've summarised the book so well! I love how Whipple can make you feel so deeply for her characters, even the horrible ones.
Danielle said…
I've looked at this book so many times and contemplated getting it, but it does have a darkish subject matter, so I've always ended up picking out another book instead. After finally starting one of her books, though, I see I am just going to have to get this one despite the subject matter. She's very good at creating a believable character, isn't she?
Yes, very readable and the characters stay with you - especially that bully Geoffrey!

Whipple draws people and evokes raw emotion so very well/
Anonymous said…
Your review makes me it's another Whipple I really want to read! What beautiful endpapers too!
JoAnn said…
I loved Someone at a Distance... this will be my next Whipple. Thanks for the review.

Popular posts from this blog

Another giveaway

This time, the publicist at WW Norton sent me two copies of The Glass of Time , by Michael Cox--so I'm giving away the second copy. Cox is the author of The Meaning of Night, and this book is the follow-up to that. Leave a comment here to enter to win it! The deadline is next Sunday, 10/5/08.

A giveaway winner, and another giveaway

The winner of the Girl in a Blue Dress contest is... Anna, of Diary of An Eccentric ! My new contest is for a copy of The Shape of Mercy , by Susan Meissner. According to Publisher's Weekly : Meissner's newest novel is potentially life-changing, the kind of inspirational fiction that prompts readers to call up old friends, lost loves or fallen-away family members to tell them that all is forgiven and that life is too short for holding grudges. Achingly romantic, the novel features the legacy of Mercy Hayworth—a young woman convicted during the Salem witch trials—whose words reach out from the past to forever transform the lives of two present-day women. These book lovers—Abigail Boyles, elderly, bitter and frail, and Lauren Lars Durough, wealthy, earnest and young—become unlikely friends, drawn together over the untimely death of Mercy, whose precious diary is all that remains of her too short life. And what a diary! Mercy's words not only beguile but help Abigail and Lars...

Review: The Piano Teacher, by Janice Y.K. Lee

The Piano Teacher is a complicated novel. On the surface, it’s about a love affair between two British ex-patriots in Hong Kong in 1952-3. Claire Pendleton comes to Hong Kong with her husband Martin at a time when the world is still recovering from WWII; Claire takes up work as a piano teacher for the daughter of a wealthy Chinese family, where she meets Will Truesdale, the Chens’ enigmatic chauffeur. The book jumps back in time between the 1950s and the beginning of WWII, when Will is interned in Stanley, a Hong Kong camp for enemies of Japan. On “the outside” is Tudy Liang, Will’s beautiful Eurasian lover. There’s no doubt that Lee’s writing is beautiful. But there’s something lacking in this short, terse novel that I can’t quite put my finger on. First, I think it’s the tenses she uses when taking about each story: that which is set in the 1950s is in the past tense, while the war scenes are talked about in the present tense (confusing, no?) The interpersonal relationships of the m...