Skip to main content

Review: The Regency, by Cynthia Harrod-Eagles


Pages: 586
Original date of publication: 1990
My edition: 2006 (Sphere)
Why I decided to read: continuation of the Morland Dynasty series
How I acquired my copy: Amazon.com, September 2009

#13: 1807-1815; covers the Regency; Napoleonic period; Luddite rebellions

The Regency is the continuation of Heloise Morland’s story. In the previous book in the series, The Victory, we saw Heloise marry her heart’s desire, James Morland. Here, we witness Heloise’s re-adjustment to life at Morland Place, and deal with the challenge of taming James’s unruly daughter, Fanny, for whom she is a sort of regent before Fanny comes of age. Aged eleven when the novel begins, Fanny matures into a young woman who is anxious to gain not only her inheritance of Morland Place, but her grandfather Hobsbawn’s cotton mill empire. But a wrench is thrown into her plans when she falls in love with the up-to-no-good Lieutenant Hawker. Meanwhile, Lucy is trying to deal with the death of Weston, remaining friends with Beau Brummell and his set. Many characters are born in this book, including Nicholas and Benedict, who play leading roles in further books in this series.

I always like the books in the series that focus on the family more and not the political events taking place around them. It’s not that those political events are uninteresting (though the Napoleonic period isn’t really my thing); it’s simply that I’m becoming more and more interested in the Morlands as people, the more I read about them. The Morlands's stories tend to be a bit soap opera-ish, but are satisfying reads nevertheless.I love reading novels that focus on the way that people lived in the past, and the Morland series certainly gives its readers a good glimpse into the lives of ordinary people from the past. It was interesting to see the interplay between the older generation (Jemima’s children, now more or less middle-aged) and the younger generation—some of which experience their very own coming-out Season in London, even as war rages elsewhere in Europe.

Heloise is a bit too Mary Sue-ish, and I found myself getting frustrated with the extremely selfish Fanny (shades of Annunciata, perhaps?); but what I like about the characters in this series is that they seem like flesh-and-blood people, who might easily have lived, and who made mistakes just the same as anyone else. Cynthia Harrod-Eagles really knows how to tell a good story, and keep her readers interested in her characters over a period of time—especially since many of them appear in multiple books. It's quite a feat to keep up that kind of momentum in any series as long-running as this one is. Despite what happens at the end of this book, I have to applaud Harrod-Eagles for writing the story that way; I feel that there’s only so much she could have done with Fanny’s story in the long run, anyways.

The author sometimes lifts sentences straight from Jane Austen, especially when the girls are coming out in London; and the book's copyediting was atrocious, as was the author's erratic spelling of the word "show." Nonetheless, I think this is a strong addition to the Morland Dynasty saga, and certainly better than some of the others.

Comments

Teresa said…
I totally agree with you about the well-rounded characters. It's been one of the pleasures of the series. I'm just three books ahead of you at this point, and while this wasn't one of my particular favorites, the next two were. I do tend to like the series more when there's a little more history, though, so your impression may be different.
Joanne said…
Fantastic that you've read through 13 in the series! I just completed book 1 -- The Founding, and it was enjoyable, but not quite compelling enough to make me want to work my way through the entire series. I'm glad I got a little "taste" of it.
Teddy Rose said…
Great review! I am just starting on book one. I decided I have to try it with all of the high recommendations around the blogesvere. I hope I don't get hooked!

Popular posts from this blog

Another giveaway

This time, the publicist at WW Norton sent me two copies of The Glass of Time , by Michael Cox--so I'm giving away the second copy. Cox is the author of The Meaning of Night, and this book is the follow-up to that. Leave a comment here to enter to win it! The deadline is next Sunday, 10/5/08.

A giveaway winner, and another giveaway

The winner of the Girl in a Blue Dress contest is... Anna, of Diary of An Eccentric ! My new contest is for a copy of The Shape of Mercy , by Susan Meissner. According to Publisher's Weekly : Meissner's newest novel is potentially life-changing, the kind of inspirational fiction that prompts readers to call up old friends, lost loves or fallen-away family members to tell them that all is forgiven and that life is too short for holding grudges. Achingly romantic, the novel features the legacy of Mercy Hayworth—a young woman convicted during the Salem witch trials—whose words reach out from the past to forever transform the lives of two present-day women. These book lovers—Abigail Boyles, elderly, bitter and frail, and Lauren Lars Durough, wealthy, earnest and young—become unlikely friends, drawn together over the untimely death of Mercy, whose precious diary is all that remains of her too short life. And what a diary! Mercy's words not only beguile but help Abigail and Lars...

Review: The Piano Teacher, by Janice Y.K. Lee

The Piano Teacher is a complicated novel. On the surface, it’s about a love affair between two British ex-patriots in Hong Kong in 1952-3. Claire Pendleton comes to Hong Kong with her husband Martin at a time when the world is still recovering from WWII; Claire takes up work as a piano teacher for the daughter of a wealthy Chinese family, where she meets Will Truesdale, the Chens’ enigmatic chauffeur. The book jumps back in time between the 1950s and the beginning of WWII, when Will is interned in Stanley, a Hong Kong camp for enemies of Japan. On “the outside” is Tudy Liang, Will’s beautiful Eurasian lover. There’s no doubt that Lee’s writing is beautiful. But there’s something lacking in this short, terse novel that I can’t quite put my finger on. First, I think it’s the tenses she uses when taking about each story: that which is set in the 1950s is in the past tense, while the war scenes are talked about in the present tense (confusing, no?) The interpersonal relationships of the m...