Skip to main content

Movie tie-ins: Confessions of a Shopaholic


In preparation for the movie version, Dial Press is coming out with a new trade paperback tie-in of Confessions of a Shopaholic. Compare it with the original mass market paperback cover:


Personally, I like the old cover better... but then again, I've always thought that movie tie-ins in general are a little tacky. What do you think?

Comments

Alicia said…
I always prefer the original covers to the movie tie-in. I have even been known to not buy a book specifically because of the cover being a movie tie-in. :)
October 28, 2008 at 1:45 PM
Kristen M. said…
I'm the same too. I will avoid buying a book at a specific time if they only have the movie tie-in cover and I will find it later in a better cover. Mostly, I like to be able to be free to imagine the characters on my own and when they stick an actor there on the cover, it ruins that freedom.
October 28, 2008 at 1:47 PM
Anonymous said…
I am not at all keen on the movie tie-in covers, because, as you've said, they're usually tacky.

Also, as a bookstore employee all it means is repeated conversations that yes this is the same book as that one but with a different cover, and that no I don't think the publishing company is trying to dupe you into thinking it's a different book, etc.
October 28, 2008 at 2:47 PM
Luanne said…
I like the original as well. Movie tie in releases always seem to detract from the book for me. If I haven't read the book, but don't especially like the actor, I might just give it a pass.
October 28, 2008 at 3:37 PM
Anna said…
I completely agree with you about movie tie-ins being tacky. But I'm sure there are some people who'll buy the book just because there's a certain actor on the cover or they like the movie, so I guess they serve their purpose.

--Anna
Diary of an Eccentric
October 28, 2008 at 9:40 PM
Anonymous said…
I always prefer the original covers because the movie tie-in ones are always too tacky. I also think that movie and books should be separate. The movie poster should never conquer the book cover. Do you ever see the other way around?
October 28, 2008 at 11:25 PM
Alea said…
Usually I prefer the original too but in this case I really like the movie tie-in cover. Some great colors and a hilarious photograph! It also helps that I never was too jazzed about the original cover!
October 29, 2008 at 9:38 AM
Bookfool said…
I almost always prefer the old cover over a movie tie-in. The only exception is when the actor is just so freaking handsome that I want to stare at the cover (Anna was talking about idiots like me . . . swayed by a handsome face; embarrassing, but true). I love the Robert Redford cover of The Natural, for example.

This one -- doesn't look like the Becky of my imagination.
October 29, 2008 at 9:45 PM
Anna said…
Bookfool, you're certainly not an idiot!!

I'd probably by a book if Stuart Townsend was on the cover. LOL

--Anna
Diary of an Eccentric
October 29, 2008 at 9:49 PM
Anonymous said…
I like the old one better, too. I always feel like a sell-out if I buy a book with a movie cover. I don't know why.
November 3, 2008 at 9:07 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another giveaway

This time, the publicist at WW Norton sent me two copies of The Glass of Time , by Michael Cox--so I'm giving away the second copy. Cox is the author of The Meaning of Night, and this book is the follow-up to that. Leave a comment here to enter to win it! The deadline is next Sunday, 10/5/08.
194 comments
Read more

A giveaway winner, and another giveaway

The winner of the Girl in a Blue Dress contest is... Anna, of Diary of An Eccentric ! My new contest is for a copy of The Shape of Mercy , by Susan Meissner. According to Publisher's Weekly : Meissner's newest novel is potentially life-changing, the kind of inspirational fiction that prompts readers to call up old friends, lost loves or fallen-away family members to tell them that all is forgiven and that life is too short for holding grudges. Achingly romantic, the novel features the legacy of Mercy Hayworth—a young woman convicted during the Salem witch trials—whose words reach out from the past to forever transform the lives of two present-day women. These book lovers—Abigail Boyles, elderly, bitter and frail, and Lauren Lars Durough, wealthy, earnest and young—become unlikely friends, drawn together over the untimely death of Mercy, whose precious diary is all that remains of her too short life. And what a diary! Mercy's words not only beguile but help Abigail and Lars
115 comments
Read more

Six Degrees of Barbara Pym's Novels

This year seems to be The Year of Barbara Pym; I know some of you out there are involved in some kind of a readalong in honor of the 100th year of her birth. I’ve read most of her canon, with only The Sweet Dove Died, Civil to Strangers, An Academic Question, and Crampton Hodnet left to go (sadly). Barbara Pym’s novels feature very similar casts of characters: spinsters, clergymen, retirees, clerks, and anthropologists, with which she had direct experience. So it stands to reason that there would be overlaps in characters between the novels. You can trace that though the publication history of her books and therefore see how Pym onionizes her stories and characters. She adds layers onto layers, adding more details as her books progress. Some Tame Gazelle (1950): Archdeacon Hoccleve makes his first appearance. Excellent Women (1952): Archdeacon Hoccleve gives a sermon that is almost incomprehensible to Mildred Lathbury; Everard Bone understands it, however, and laughs
6 comments
Read more