Skip to main content

Movie tie-ins: Confessions of a Shopaholic


In preparation for the movie version, Dial Press is coming out with a new trade paperback tie-in of Confessions of a Shopaholic. Compare it with the original mass market paperback cover:


Personally, I like the old cover better... but then again, I've always thought that movie tie-ins in general are a little tacky. What do you think?

Comments

Alicia said…
I always prefer the original covers to the movie tie-in. I have even been known to not buy a book specifically because of the cover being a movie tie-in. :)
Kristen M. said…
I'm the same too. I will avoid buying a book at a specific time if they only have the movie tie-in cover and I will find it later in a better cover. Mostly, I like to be able to be free to imagine the characters on my own and when they stick an actor there on the cover, it ruins that freedom.
bookchronicle said…
I am not at all keen on the movie tie-in covers, because, as you've said, they're usually tacky.

Also, as a bookstore employee all it means is repeated conversations that yes this is the same book as that one but with a different cover, and that no I don't think the publishing company is trying to dupe you into thinking it's a different book, etc.
Luanne said…
I like the original as well. Movie tie in releases always seem to detract from the book for me. If I haven't read the book, but don't especially like the actor, I might just give it a pass.
Anna said…
I completely agree with you about movie tie-ins being tacky. But I'm sure there are some people who'll buy the book just because there's a certain actor on the cover or they like the movie, so I guess they serve their purpose.

--Anna
Diary of an Eccentric
mattviews said…
I always prefer the original covers because the movie tie-in ones are always too tacky. I also think that movie and books should be separate. The movie poster should never conquer the book cover. Do you ever see the other way around?
Alea said…
Usually I prefer the original too but in this case I really like the movie tie-in cover. Some great colors and a hilarious photograph! It also helps that I never was too jazzed about the original cover!
Bookfool said…
I almost always prefer the old cover over a movie tie-in. The only exception is when the actor is just so freaking handsome that I want to stare at the cover (Anna was talking about idiots like me . . . swayed by a handsome face; embarrassing, but true). I love the Robert Redford cover of The Natural, for example.

This one -- doesn't look like the Becky of my imagination.
Anna said…
Bookfool, you're certainly not an idiot!!

I'd probably by a book if Stuart Townsend was on the cover. LOL

--Anna
Diary of an Eccentric
nbbaker1102 said…
I like the old one better, too. I always feel like a sell-out if I buy a book with a movie cover. I don't know why.

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Forever Amber, by Kathleen Winsor

Pages: 972 Originally published: 1944 My edition: 2000 (Chicago Review Press) How I acquired my copy: Amazon.com, 2004

Forever Amber takes place in the 1660s, immediately follwing Charles II's ("the Merry Monarch") return of the Stuarts to the English throne. The book features Amber St. Claire, a young woman who starts out as a sixteen-year-old country girl, naieve to the workings of the world. She immediately meets Bruce Carlton, a dashing young Cavalier, with whom she has a passionate love affair in choppy intervals throughout the book. They have two children together, but Bruce won't marry her for the reason he tells his friend Lord Almsbury: that Amber just isn't the kind of woman one marries.

Upon following Bruce to London, he goes to Virginia, leaving her to fend for herself. What follows is a series of affairs and four marriages, with Bruce coming back from America now and then. Amber's marriages are imprudent: her first husband is a gambler, her second is…

Review: Jane Austen's Letters, ed. by Deirdre Le Faye

Pages: 667 Original date of publication: 2011 My copy: 2011 (Oxford University Press) Why I decided to read: How I acquired my copy: Amazon.com, April 2013
This is a compilation of many of Jane Austen’s letters, most of them sent to her sister Cassandra between 1796 and 1817, the year of her death. Although many of Austen’s letters were destroyed by her sister in order to preserve the family reputation, the collection contains over 160 letters in which Austen gives her sister details about her life in Chawton—as well as giving us a tantalizing glimpse of what was going through her mind as she was writing her novels (especially the novel that was to become Pride and Prejudice, First Impressions). There are other letters here, too, giving advice to her niece and professional correspondence to publishers—as well as a couple of letters that were written by Cassandra Austen after Jane’s death.
To the sisters, the letters acted in the way that phone calls do today; Austen’s news is all about pe…

Review: Midnight in Peking, by Paul French

Pages: 259 Original date of publication: 2013 My copy: 2013 (Penguin) Why I decided to read: How I acquired my copy: Phoenix bookstore, May 2013
In January 1937, the body of a young British girl, Pamela Werner, was found near Peking’s Fox Tower. Although two detectives, one British and the other Chinese, spent months on the case, the case was never solved completely, and the case was forgotten in the wake of the invasion of the Japanese. Frustrated, Pamela’s father, a former diplomat, tried to solve the crime. His investigation took him into the underbelly of Peking society and uncovered a secret that was worse than anything he could have imagined.
At first, I thought that this would be a pretty straightforward retelling of a true crime, but what Paul French (who spent seven years researching the story) reveals in this book is much more than that. Foreign society in Peking in the 1930s was stratified, with the British colonials at the top and the White Russian refugees at the bottom, but…