Skip to main content

Review: The Kings' Mistresses, by Elizabeth Goldsmith


Pages: 256
Original date of publication: 2012
My edition: 2012 (Public Affairs)
Why I decided to read: offered through the LTER program
How I acquired my copy: review copy from LTER, April 2012


“A woman’s reputation depends on not being talked about.” So went the first line of Hortense Mazarin’s memoirs, belying the fact that much of her life, and that of her sister, Marie Mancini, was lived in the public eye, talked about and written about in the public gazettes. Both sisters bucked the traditions of the time by running away and seeking divorces from their husbands. The nieces of Cardinal Mazarin, Hortense and Marie made an impact early on at the French court, where Marie had a love affair with the King. A review of the book in a blurb on the back from Kirkus Reviews compares the two sisters to the Kardashians—a not unfair comparison.

I think it would be a cliché to say that a work of nonfiction is written as though it’s fiction, but the story of Marie and Hortense is written in an easy-flowing, exciting, and informative way. I didn’t know anything about the sisters before reading this book, but I enjoyed tracking their adventures through Italy, France, England, and Spain—some of which made me thing that the Mazarin/Mancini sisters had been reading too much popular fiction of the day (at one point one of them and her maid dress as men in their travels to escape detection). What’s clear is that neither of the sisters was afraid to live life “in the moment,” not seeming to care about the future. Therefore, Marie and Hortense came off as spoiled brats sometimes.

The book is well researched, though, and it’s a very detailed portrait of the two sisters whose lives were so much in the public eye. They were among the first media celebrities in the early days of the tabloid press and two of he first women not of royalty to publish the history of their lives. Hortense was written about in connection with her divorce, her relationship with the English King Charles I (note in the title where “Kings” is in the plural), and gambling habit; both sisters bucked convention by traveling for pleasure and leaving their husbands. Their images were captured in art and grace galleries throughout the world.

However, I wish that the author had included more information about the social norms of the time, so that the reader would have at the back of their minds a comparison. But other that that, I thought that this was an insightful look into the lives of two intelligent, fascinating women who overcame obstacles that hindered many other women of their time.

The author, Elizabeth Goldsmith, is a professor of French. She became interested in the sisters’ lives while working on a historical study of French women writers.

Comments

FABR Steph said…
I do enjoy nonfiction that reads similar to fiction, however, your comment about wishing for the inclusion of social norms is somewhat a red flag for me as it is the aspect that I so often enjoy the most. Thank you for the lovely review.

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Forever Amber, by Kathleen Winsor

Pages: 972 Originally published: 1944 My edition: 2000 (Chicago Review Press) How I acquired my copy: Amazon.com, 2004

Forever Amber takes place in the 1660s, immediately follwing Charles II's ("the Merry Monarch") return of the Stuarts to the English throne. The book features Amber St. Claire, a young woman who starts out as a sixteen-year-old country girl, naieve to the workings of the world. She immediately meets Bruce Carlton, a dashing young Cavalier, with whom she has a passionate love affair in choppy intervals throughout the book. They have two children together, but Bruce won't marry her for the reason he tells his friend Lord Almsbury: that Amber just isn't the kind of woman one marries.

Upon following Bruce to London, he goes to Virginia, leaving her to fend for herself. What follows is a series of affairs and four marriages, with Bruce coming back from America now and then. Amber's marriages are imprudent: her first husband is a gambler, her second is…

Review: Jane Austen's Letters, ed. by Deirdre Le Faye

Pages: 667 Original date of publication: 2011 My copy: 2011 (Oxford University Press) Why I decided to read: How I acquired my copy: Amazon.com, April 2013
This is a compilation of many of Jane Austen’s letters, most of them sent to her sister Cassandra between 1796 and 1817, the year of her death. Although many of Austen’s letters were destroyed by her sister in order to preserve the family reputation, the collection contains over 160 letters in which Austen gives her sister details about her life in Chawton—as well as giving us a tantalizing glimpse of what was going through her mind as she was writing her novels (especially the novel that was to become Pride and Prejudice, First Impressions). There are other letters here, too, giving advice to her niece and professional correspondence to publishers—as well as a couple of letters that were written by Cassandra Austen after Jane’s death.
To the sisters, the letters acted in the way that phone calls do today; Austen’s news is all about pe…

Review: Midnight in Peking, by Paul French

Pages: 259 Original date of publication: 2013 My copy: 2013 (Penguin) Why I decided to read: How I acquired my copy: Phoenix bookstore, May 2013
In January 1937, the body of a young British girl, Pamela Werner, was found near Peking’s Fox Tower. Although two detectives, one British and the other Chinese, spent months on the case, the case was never solved completely, and the case was forgotten in the wake of the invasion of the Japanese. Frustrated, Pamela’s father, a former diplomat, tried to solve the crime. His investigation took him into the underbelly of Peking society and uncovered a secret that was worse than anything he could have imagined.
At first, I thought that this would be a pretty straightforward retelling of a true crime, but what Paul French (who spent seven years researching the story) reveals in this book is much more than that. Foreign society in Peking in the 1930s was stratified, with the British colonials at the top and the White Russian refugees at the bottom, but…