Skip to main content

Review: Bring up the Bodies by Hilary Mantel


Pages: 410
Original date of publication: 2012
My edition: 2012 (Henry Holt)
Why I decided to read: review copy was offered by the publisher
How I acquired my copy: Review copy from the publisher, April 2012


Bring Up the Bodies has been anticipated greatly by me (and I’m sure many others) ever since I read Hilary Mantel’s fabulous Wolf Hall in 2009. The second book in a trilogy, Bring up the Bodies begins in 1535 and covers the dissolution of Henry VIII’s marriage to Anne Boleyn and her execution in 1536.

While this book covers the strange events of that time, the book is actually more about Thomas Cromwell—the enigmatic, far-range-thinking mastermind behind both the Katherine of Aragon divorce and Anne Boleyn’s trial. To read this novel properly, it must be remembered that Cromwell is the star of this show, not Henry or Anne. Cromwell is one of most fascinating figures of Tudor England—and in this book and in Wolf Hall, Mantel portrays him in a more positive light than previous novels and films have. Cromwell was not good at showing emotion, which served him well in politics at court. He had an ironic, often sarcastic sense of humor. You are not going to connect emotionally with Cromwell’s character. Rather, this book makes you want to know more about what must have been going on in his head. People around him avoided, even disliked, him for a good reason: he was probably very difficult to get close to or to understand.

Because he, Cromwell, truly was a mastermind: shrewd, anticipating every contingency. For that reason he is little interested in his past, so although his deceased wife and children pop up every now and then, he does not dwell on the past. He is interested in metaphor, constantly comparing one thing with another. Part of Cromwell’s position entailed understanding and anticipating his master; but while he sought to serve Henry VIII, he still has his own interests at heart. He is cynical about the motives of the people around him and trusts no one—not even Henry.

It seems that Hilary Mantel listened to her Wolf Hall readers—she is much clearer with her pronouns this time around. Her previous book covers a larger time span; this book only covers a period of nine months, so the pace of this novel is breakneck. Less attention is given to the plot or outcome of the book, which the reader knows anyways; Mantel’s skill lies in being concise. Usually, historical fiction written in the present tense drives me nuts, but I hardly even noticed with this novel; Mantel’s prose is seamless. There are probably hundreds of novels out there about the downfall of Anne Boleyn, but this one stands head and shoulders (no pun intended) above the rest.

Comments

Guernsey Girl said…
A tantalizing review! I have been interested in Hilary Mantel's books (apart from her prize-winning fame) ever since I saw her interviewed on television a while ago. It explained to me a lot about her writing...
Aarti said…
I really loved this book! Totally met my expectations. I read another person's review that said he believed Mantel idealized Cromwell. But I don't think that's the case. I think we see just how ruthless Cromwell can be in this book, and just how many enemies he made over the course of it. But we also see that perhaps he didn't have any choice- he really had no friends at court besides Henry, and needed make him happy above all else.
Marg said…
I bought Wolf Hall as soon as it came out, and then haven't even opened it up to read the first page. I should probably do that, and then I could read this one!

Popular posts from this blog

Another giveaway

This time, the publicist at WW Norton sent me two copies of The Glass of Time , by Michael Cox--so I'm giving away the second copy. Cox is the author of The Meaning of Night, and this book is the follow-up to that. Leave a comment here to enter to win it! The deadline is next Sunday, 10/5/08.

A giveaway winner, and another giveaway

The winner of the Girl in a Blue Dress contest is... Anna, of Diary of An Eccentric ! My new contest is for a copy of The Shape of Mercy , by Susan Meissner. According to Publisher's Weekly : Meissner's newest novel is potentially life-changing, the kind of inspirational fiction that prompts readers to call up old friends, lost loves or fallen-away family members to tell them that all is forgiven and that life is too short for holding grudges. Achingly romantic, the novel features the legacy of Mercy Hayworth—a young woman convicted during the Salem witch trials—whose words reach out from the past to forever transform the lives of two present-day women. These book lovers—Abigail Boyles, elderly, bitter and frail, and Lauren Lars Durough, wealthy, earnest and young—become unlikely friends, drawn together over the untimely death of Mercy, whose precious diary is all that remains of her too short life. And what a diary! Mercy's words not only beguile but help Abigail and Lars

Six Degrees of Barbara Pym's Novels

This year seems to be The Year of Barbara Pym; I know some of you out there are involved in some kind of a readalong in honor of the 100th year of her birth. I’ve read most of her canon, with only The Sweet Dove Died, Civil to Strangers, An Academic Question, and Crampton Hodnet left to go (sadly). Barbara Pym’s novels feature very similar casts of characters: spinsters, clergymen, retirees, clerks, and anthropologists, with which she had direct experience. So it stands to reason that there would be overlaps in characters between the novels. You can trace that though the publication history of her books and therefore see how Pym onionizes her stories and characters. She adds layers onto layers, adding more details as her books progress. Some Tame Gazelle (1950): Archdeacon Hoccleve makes his first appearance. Excellent Women (1952): Archdeacon Hoccleve gives a sermon that is almost incomprehensible to Mildred Lathbury; Everard Bone understands it, however, and laughs