Skip to main content

The Sunday Salon


Happy Sunday! This weekend has been eventful; last night was the annual holiday party for work downtown. It’s a huge event—apparently, there were about 700 people there (employees plus guests plus other assorted people connected to the company who were invited). It was a semi-formal event, and people got pretty dressed up for it. It was pretty good—we’re a company with eleven different locations in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, so it was good to see people I haven’t seen in a long time. Regarding what I wore, I hate shopping, so what my mom did on Friday afternoon was go shopping for me! She basically bought a few options, had me try them on at home, and then returned what I didn't want. I eventually settled on a cocktail dress with black velvet sleves, with the rest blue satin. It turns out that I've lost a lot of weight recently, so it was amazing that she got my new size right. And I'm tinier than I thought I was!

At work, due to the holidays this week was the first five-day week we’ve had in a long time, and it was a bit hard to get back into the swing of things—it’s been very busy lately, too.

In terms of reading, I completed Fidelity, by Susan Glaspell (a Persephone) and The Queen’s Governess, by Karen Harper (coming out on the 21st). I’m now most of the way through Twilight of Avalon, by Anna Elliott. At first, I thought it was going to be more fantasy-oriented, but I’m pleasantly surprised that it’s not.

Coming up this week is the publication of Elizabeth Kostova’s new book, The Swan Thieves. I’m still puzzling over the fact that the author of such a great book as The Historian could have published something as awful as her new one (which, by the way, I couldn't finish). I really sort of struggled over whether or not to write a review of the book. But I'd like to be known for being honest. My review will be up this week, but I warn you it won’t be pretty. What about you? If you hate a book, do you post a review? Or are you one of those people who, if you have nothing nice to say, you say nothing at all? I’ll also post a review of Alice I Have Been, by Melanie Benjamin, which is also coming out this week. I also have a few other reviews scheduled for this week.

How was your week?

Comments

Sometimes, writing a review for a bad book is better than writing a review for a good book! I absolutely hated The Historian, but I really enjoyed writing that review. I try and review everything I read, so yes, yes I do!
dolleygurl said…
I haven't read a book I have hated since I started reviewing, but I would probably still review it. The one I'm reading now is only so-so, but I plan on telling why I feel that way. I think it is fair to let others know why something just didn't work for you.
judy said…
I agree with the other comments. Any review, no matter how erudite or amateur, is essentially an opinion. I enjoy seeing how different readers react to the same book.

Wow, you must be the only person who lost weight over the holidays!

This week I read a book that has been on my TBR soon list ever since I read The Magicians by Lev Grossman. Little, Big by John Crowley. I am having some kind of second childhood with fantasy lately. This book completely blew me away with its interaction between humans and fairies in the modern day. Probably not for everyone but highly recommended as a top example of the genre.
Diane said…
Katherine....congrats on your weight loss -- always a struggle it seems for me.

I was sorry to hear that Swan Thieves was disappointing for you. I was hoping to read it next weekend for the mystery read-a-thon.

I always write an honest review positive or negative. I do try to find something positive to say but then tell it like it was :) I'll be looking for your review.
Bookfool said…
It's often helpful to read a variety of opinions about a book before making a decision, so a negative review can be a great thing to read -- nice to see them in the mix, sometimes. As to writing negative reviews . . . it depends. If I don't have anything positive to say at all, I will likely skip reviewing or say very little. I do review DNFs, sometimes, though. I used to never write DNF reviews but even bad exposure is still exposure for an author, so I started to write them and have been surprised by the positive reaction.

I actually just finished The Swan Thieves and I enjoyed it, but I haven't read The Historian, so I have no basis for comparison. At times, I thought it was a drag and the ending kind of stunned me in a "don't buy that" way, but at the same time, I felt satisfied. Oh, dear. I can tell I'm going to have a terrible time with that review!

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Forever Amber, by Kathleen Winsor

Pages: 972 Originally published: 1944 My edition: 2000 (Chicago Review Press) How I acquired my copy: Amazon.com, 2004

Forever Amber takes place in the 1660s, immediately follwing Charles II's ("the Merry Monarch") return of the Stuarts to the English throne. The book features Amber St. Claire, a young woman who starts out as a sixteen-year-old country girl, naieve to the workings of the world. She immediately meets Bruce Carlton, a dashing young Cavalier, with whom she has a passionate love affair in choppy intervals throughout the book. They have two children together, but Bruce won't marry her for the reason he tells his friend Lord Almsbury: that Amber just isn't the kind of woman one marries.

Upon following Bruce to London, he goes to Virginia, leaving her to fend for herself. What follows is a series of affairs and four marriages, with Bruce coming back from America now and then. Amber's marriages are imprudent: her first husband is a gambler, her second is…

Review: Jane Austen's Letters, ed. by Deirdre Le Faye

Pages: 667 Original date of publication: 2011 My copy: 2011 (Oxford University Press) Why I decided to read: How I acquired my copy: Amazon.com, April 2013
This is a compilation of many of Jane Austen’s letters, most of them sent to her sister Cassandra between 1796 and 1817, the year of her death. Although many of Austen’s letters were destroyed by her sister in order to preserve the family reputation, the collection contains over 160 letters in which Austen gives her sister details about her life in Chawton—as well as giving us a tantalizing glimpse of what was going through her mind as she was writing her novels (especially the novel that was to become Pride and Prejudice, First Impressions). There are other letters here, too, giving advice to her niece and professional correspondence to publishers—as well as a couple of letters that were written by Cassandra Austen after Jane’s death.
To the sisters, the letters acted in the way that phone calls do today; Austen’s news is all about pe…

Review: Midnight in Peking, by Paul French

Pages: 259 Original date of publication: 2013 My copy: 2013 (Penguin) Why I decided to read: How I acquired my copy: Phoenix bookstore, May 2013
In January 1937, the body of a young British girl, Pamela Werner, was found near Peking’s Fox Tower. Although two detectives, one British and the other Chinese, spent months on the case, the case was never solved completely, and the case was forgotten in the wake of the invasion of the Japanese. Frustrated, Pamela’s father, a former diplomat, tried to solve the crime. His investigation took him into the underbelly of Peking society and uncovered a secret that was worse than anything he could have imagined.
At first, I thought that this would be a pretty straightforward retelling of a true crime, but what Paul French (who spent seven years researching the story) reveals in this book is much more than that. Foreign society in Peking in the 1930s was stratified, with the British colonials at the top and the White Russian refugees at the bottom, but…