Skip to main content

The Sunday Salon

It’s yet another quiet weekend here. In the past week, I’ve read:

The Ivy Tree, by Mary Stewart
The Princeling, by Cynthia Harrod Eagles
The Last Days of the Romanovs, by Helen Rappaport

I enjoyed all three of these books, so It’s been a good week, reading-wise. I've also been trying to write a review of Sarah Bower's The Book of Love, but I've gotten stuck with it (it dragged in the middle). I’m just about to start The Priory, by Dorothy Whipple, a Persephone classic that took about two weeks to get to me from

I’ve been wondering about something recently: ARCs. I know a lot of you get them and review them; so do I. My question for you is about your reviews: do you post them as soon as you read the book and write the review? Or do you wait until the day of publication to post? I’ve been seeing a lot of reviews of to-be-published books, ages before the book comes out, so that’s what prompted the question. Thoughts?


Anonymous said…
That's a good question about ARCs. Mt. TBR is usually piled so high that I organize it by release date, so when I get an ARC of a book that doesn't come out for several months, I just plan not to read it for a while. I try to read and review ARCs no more than 2 weeks before the release date, usually just a day or two beforehand when the buzz is already building.

I'm currently reading an ARC of a book that doesn't come out until June (just couldn't wait), so I'll probably discuss it a bit this week but save the full review for closer to the release. That's just me, though.

I'll be interested to follow comments here and see what others have to say.
Meghan said…
I always post the review near the book's release date. I do have them organized by release and normally read more or less in order, but there are always those few special ones that sneak their way into my hands early. For those, I write the review shortly after reading the book, but schedule it ahead for whenever it comes out. I might discuss it in the Sunday salon or something similar, but the proper review will wait. I guess I want people who are interested in the book to be able to get it right away if they so choose. I feel like I've heard from more publicists that reviews closer to release are better as well.

- Meghan @ Medieval Bookworm
Anonymous said…
I try to post reviews close to the publication date, although sometimes that doesn't quite happen. I'm much pickier about what books I receive, so I'm able to review in a more timely manner. - Stephanie
Adele said…
I haven't had many ARC's. Most of the review copies I have had are already released. I tend to think though that they will send out the ARC's when they want the first wave of buzz about the book and since people can't all drop everything to read them there will probably be a steady trickle of reviews. I do think it's pretty effective when I see a book on the shelves and there was a huge buzz a few months ago, it triggers my "must have that" response.

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Forever Amber, by Kathleen Winsor

Forever Amber takes place in the 1660s, immediately follwing Charles II's ("the Merry Monarch") return of the Stuarts to the English throne. The book features Amber St. Claire, a young woman who starts out as a sixteen-year-old country girl, naieve to the workings of the world. She immediately meets Bruce Carlton, a dashing young Cavalier, with whom she has a passionate love affair in choppy intervals throughout the book. They have two children together, but Bruce won't marry her for the reason he tells his friend Lord Almsbury: that Amber just isn't the kind of woman one marries.

Upon following Bruce to London, he goes to Virginia, leaving her to fend for herself. What follows is a series of affairs and four marriages, with Bruce coming back from America now and then. Amber's marriages are imprudent: her first husband is a gambler, her second is an old dotard, her third locks her up in the house for days and won't let her out; and the last is a fop who a…

Review: This Rough Magic, by Mary Stewart

Pages: 254Original date of publication: 1964My edition: 1964 (William Morrow)Why I decided to read: it was 90 degrees outside at the time and I decided it was time to read another book by a favorite authorHow I acquired my copy: from Susanna Kearsley, December 2009Sometimes, whether or not I decide to read a book depends on the weather. Mary Stewart’s books are best read on either very hot or very cold days; and since it was 90 degrees out one weekend a couple of weeks ago, I decided that this one would be perfect. And it was.This Rough Magic takes its title from The Tempest, a play from which this novel takes off. Lucy Waring is a struggling actress who comes to visit her sister on Corfu. One of her neighbors is a renowned actor who’s taken a bit of a sabbatical and his son, a musician with whom Lucy comes to blows at first. This Rough Magic is vintage Mary Stewart, with a murder or two, a mystery, romance, suspense, and lots of magic thrown in. Lucy is your typical Mary Stewart hero…

Review: Joy in the Morning, by Betty Smith

Pages: 294
Original date of publication: 1963
My edition: 2010 (Harper Perennial)
Why I decided to read:
How I acquired my copy: Barnes and Noble, Phoenix, January 2011

A Tree Grows in Brooklyn is one of my all-time favorite books and I’ve read it, oh, half a dozen times, so I was interested to see how Joy in the Morning would compare.

Set in the late 1920s, Joy in the Morning begins when Annie, aged 18, comes to a small Midwestern college town where her fiancée, Carl, is in law school. The novel opens with their marriage in the county courthouse, and follows the couple through their first year or so of marriage. It’s a struggle, because Carl and Annie are basically children themselves, for all the ways in which Carl tries to appear more adult-like.

Annie is endearing; she’s ignorant but a voracious reader, reading everything from Babbitt to War and Peace. Betty Smith’s novels are pretty autobiographical; Joy in the Morning is (unofficially) a kind of sequel to A Tree Grows in Brooklyn—cert…