Skip to main content

Weekly Geeks


In the third Weekly Geeks of 2009, let's have fun with the classics. For our purposes, I'm defining a classic as anything written over 100 years ago and still in print. (If your memory needs jogging, see: Classic Literature Library for examples.)

For your assignment this week, choose two or more of the following questions:


1) How do you feel about classic literature? Are you intimidated by it? Love it? Not sure because you never actually tried it? Don't get why anyone reads anything else? Which classics, if any, have you truly loved? Which would you recommend for someone who has very little experience reading older books? Go all out, sell us on it!

I feel as though “classic literature” is a very broad category, encompassing pretty much everything: romance, history, mystery, etc. Personally, I think highly of classic literature, though there are of course the books I don’t like and the books I don’t “get” (Joyce's Dubliners and pretty much anything by Steinbeck, for example). But there are other books that I just love—anything by Jane Austen; Wuthering Heights; Jane Eyre; Bleak House; David Cooperfield; The Woman in White; The Moonstone; The Go-Between; Vanity Fair; Great Expectations; Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day; The Painted Veil. And there are many more on my TBR list.

As for recommendations, for anyone looking to start reading Charles Dickens, the places to start are either Great Expectations or Oliver Twist. For Jane Austen, definitely Pride and Prejudice, or maybe Sense and Sensibility. And Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day, while not over 100 years old, is a delightful 1930s fairy tale (and it’s much better than the movie which I was disappointed in). It’s a quick read, but very heartwarming. It’s too bad Winifred Watson never wrote much else.

Comments

Marg said…
Based on your post I am heading in the right direction at least, having just finished Great Expectations, and my next classic read is going to be Pride and Prejudice!
Miss Pettigrew is still waiting for me so thanks for the gentle reminder. Love your classics taste!
marineko said…
Your post makes me want to seek out and read Miss Pettigrew! :D
claire said…
A lot of your titles are on my list, too. :) The ones that are not, I haven't yet read.
Ali said…
I didn't really get any of the Joyce I read in college, so I don't think I'll be revisiting him anytime soon. Thanks for all the recommendations!
Maree said…
Good list :) I have a hate/hate relationship with Dickens but I'm with you on Jane Austen _ and James Joyce
Laura said…
We share a love of quite a few classics! I haven't read Miss Pettigrew, but since I like all the other books you listed, I think I'll have to read it too!
I didn't really get Steinbeck at first, but I pretended to to impress a relative as a precocious 13 year old and was rewarded with a box set with 12 of his works! And actually, as I started working through them, I found a quite few I genuinely understood and liked.

I too adore Austen, and though I got a bit confused by Wuthering Heights when I first read it, I do like Jane Eyre. Last year I decided I wanted to give Anne Bronte a hearing, and The Tenant Of Wildfell Hall flew up in to take its place alongside her sisters.

And Miss Pettigrew I also read recently. I was worried that I might be disappointed after hearing so much about it, but I was not at all, and rather pleasantly surprised in of all the praise. I learnt of it through Persephone books, and the comedy in was unexpected after Mariana by Monica Dickens, which introduced me to the publisher.
Andi said…
Great answer! I think I'd echo everything you said. There's no reason for me to participate now. lol :)
i feel bad, but i think to read the classics when there is so many great contemporary books out there. but, a big BUT, you've got me intrigued with this Miss Pettigrew… I may venture back a century or two.
RC said…
i didn't even realize miss pettigrew lives for a day was a book pre-movie.

i imagine it could be a delighful book with magic, that perhaps the film just barely missed.
Serena said…
great recommendations. I agree about starting with Charles Dickens' Great Expectations.
Dreamybee said…
Great Expectations was my first Dickens read, and I really enjoyed it!

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Forever Amber, by Kathleen Winsor

Pages: 972 Originally published: 1944 My edition: 2000 (Chicago Review Press) How I acquired my copy: Amazon.com, 2004

Forever Amber takes place in the 1660s, immediately follwing Charles II's ("the Merry Monarch") return of the Stuarts to the English throne. The book features Amber St. Claire, a young woman who starts out as a sixteen-year-old country girl, naieve to the workings of the world. She immediately meets Bruce Carlton, a dashing young Cavalier, with whom she has a passionate love affair in choppy intervals throughout the book. They have two children together, but Bruce won't marry her for the reason he tells his friend Lord Almsbury: that Amber just isn't the kind of woman one marries.

Upon following Bruce to London, he goes to Virginia, leaving her to fend for herself. What follows is a series of affairs and four marriages, with Bruce coming back from America now and then. Amber's marriages are imprudent: her first husband is a gambler, her second is…

Review: Jane Austen's Letters, ed. by Deirdre Le Faye

Pages: 667 Original date of publication: 2011 My copy: 2011 (Oxford University Press) Why I decided to read: How I acquired my copy: Amazon.com, April 2013
This is a compilation of many of Jane Austen’s letters, most of them sent to her sister Cassandra between 1796 and 1817, the year of her death. Although many of Austen’s letters were destroyed by her sister in order to preserve the family reputation, the collection contains over 160 letters in which Austen gives her sister details about her life in Chawton—as well as giving us a tantalizing glimpse of what was going through her mind as she was writing her novels (especially the novel that was to become Pride and Prejudice, First Impressions). There are other letters here, too, giving advice to her niece and professional correspondence to publishers—as well as a couple of letters that were written by Cassandra Austen after Jane’s death.
To the sisters, the letters acted in the way that phone calls do today; Austen’s news is all about pe…

Review: Midnight in Peking, by Paul French

Pages: 259 Original date of publication: 2013 My copy: 2013 (Penguin) Why I decided to read: How I acquired my copy: Phoenix bookstore, May 2013
In January 1937, the body of a young British girl, Pamela Werner, was found near Peking’s Fox Tower. Although two detectives, one British and the other Chinese, spent months on the case, the case was never solved completely, and the case was forgotten in the wake of the invasion of the Japanese. Frustrated, Pamela’s father, a former diplomat, tried to solve the crime. His investigation took him into the underbelly of Peking society and uncovered a secret that was worse than anything he could have imagined.
At first, I thought that this would be a pretty straightforward retelling of a true crime, but what Paul French (who spent seven years researching the story) reveals in this book is much more than that. Foreign society in Peking in the 1930s was stratified, with the British colonials at the top and the White Russian refugees at the bottom, but…