Skip to main content

Tuesday Thingers


Most of us book bloggers like to write book reviews- if we don't love to write book reviews- but here's today's question. When it comes to LT (and your blog), do you review every book you read? Do you just review Early Reviewers or ARCs? Do you review only if you like a book, or only if you feel like you have to? How soon after reading do you post your review? Do you post them other places- other social networking sites, Amazon, etc.?

I try to review every book I read, but sometimes I don’t, if I can’t muster up enough to say about a book. Sometimes I have very strong opinions about a book, and at other times I’ll read a book, leave it alone for a few days, come back to review it, and find that I can’t remember anything about it! I try to review all the ARCs I receive, especially since the publicist or author goes to such great length to send the book to me. I write reviews as I’m reading, and then I generally try to post those reviews within a few days of reading the book. With ARCs, however, I’ll write the review and schedule it on A Girl Walks Into a Bookstore… for the day when the book comes out. For LT, I try to do the same (I even have a calendar so I know when to post--yes, call me anal-retentive!), though my rules aren’t strict.

I post reviews here on my blog, of course, as well as on LT and Amazon. Amazon is actually where I started reviewing, back in 2004; but I post less often now. I don't know, maybe it's my ranking (top 1000), or the fact that I'm a part of Amazon Vine, but the claws really come out when I post a review on Ammy these days.

Comments

Alyce said…
I keep a calendar too, it was the only way to keep my sanity! Once my list of books requested hit 30 I knew I wasn't going to be able to remember all of the dates in my head (I would be lucky to keep track of 10 at a time.)

I try to publish my reviews the day the book is released, but right now I'm a couple of days behind on a few books. Which drives me crazy, but what are you going to do? I can't slow down time, so I just try to read faster. :)
Rose said…
I'm trying to review every book that I read from now on in my semi-new blog. It's definitely a great way to keep track of what I've read. Usually, I write my review of the book immediately upon finishing the last page.
Aunt J-ha said…
I like to write down my impressions of a book soon after I finish reading it, not necesarily a full review. I am more of an amature reviewer, I really only do it as a book lover to keep of record my reading. I just started posting mine into a blog and have never received an ARC or been asked to review anything so I think I don't feel the pressure some of you do. I do enjoy reading your reviews (and many other bloggers) and love when someone reads my reviews (which I had not anticipated.) I don't feel a need to review every single book I read, particarly if I didn't like it or have strong feelings either way.
Kelly said…
For awhile I reviewed everything that I read, but then I just did the ARCs. Now I rarely write a review, too busy with baby.
Anonymous said…
What I appreciate the most about your blog are the thoughtful reviews of the ARCs. I always look for them and keep my eye on the releases of books.

I always review what I read, but with just four or five books a month, it's manageable. I usually take notes along the way and read over what I have jot down when I'm ready to review.
Adele said…
I review most books now, at least if i manage to finish them.

Popular posts from this blog

Another giveaway

This time, the publicist at WW Norton sent me two copies of The Glass of Time , by Michael Cox--so I'm giving away the second copy. Cox is the author of The Meaning of Night, and this book is the follow-up to that. Leave a comment here to enter to win it! The deadline is next Sunday, 10/5/08.

A giveaway winner, and another giveaway

The winner of the Girl in a Blue Dress contest is... Anna, of Diary of An Eccentric ! My new contest is for a copy of The Shape of Mercy , by Susan Meissner. According to Publisher's Weekly : Meissner's newest novel is potentially life-changing, the kind of inspirational fiction that prompts readers to call up old friends, lost loves or fallen-away family members to tell them that all is forgiven and that life is too short for holding grudges. Achingly romantic, the novel features the legacy of Mercy Hayworth—a young woman convicted during the Salem witch trials—whose words reach out from the past to forever transform the lives of two present-day women. These book lovers—Abigail Boyles, elderly, bitter and frail, and Lauren Lars Durough, wealthy, earnest and young—become unlikely friends, drawn together over the untimely death of Mercy, whose precious diary is all that remains of her too short life. And what a diary! Mercy's words not only beguile but help Abigail and Lars

Six Degrees of Barbara Pym's Novels

This year seems to be The Year of Barbara Pym; I know some of you out there are involved in some kind of a readalong in honor of the 100th year of her birth. I’ve read most of her canon, with only The Sweet Dove Died, Civil to Strangers, An Academic Question, and Crampton Hodnet left to go (sadly). Barbara Pym’s novels feature very similar casts of characters: spinsters, clergymen, retirees, clerks, and anthropologists, with which she had direct experience. So it stands to reason that there would be overlaps in characters between the novels. You can trace that though the publication history of her books and therefore see how Pym onionizes her stories and characters. She adds layers onto layers, adding more details as her books progress. Some Tame Gazelle (1950): Archdeacon Hoccleve makes his first appearance. Excellent Women (1952): Archdeacon Hoccleve gives a sermon that is almost incomprehensible to Mildred Lathbury; Everard Bone understands it, however, and laughs