Skip to main content

Review: Queen Isabella, by Alison Weir

Queen Isabella: Treachery, Adultery, and Murder in Medieval England is a biography of the wife of Edward II. It’s actually a composite of things: a biography of Isabella’s most intimate household moments, drawn from her extensive household account books (want to know what was used as toilet paper in the English royal household? It’s in there), as well as an account of her relationship with her husband, his favorites, and her lover, Roger Mortimer.

My major problem with this book is Weir’s extreme bias in favor of Isabella. Weir even goes so far as to blame Edward entirely for the breakdown of the royal marriage and for Isabella’s changed demeanor during it. It’s almost as though the author went into the research and writing of this book thinking, “I’m going to vindicate Isabella.” This is a work of popular history, and as such, I feel that Weir could have been more impartial in her assessment of Isabella’s story. All that’s really known about Isabella’s day-to-day life comes from her book of household accounts, and Weir continually tries to make presumptions about how the queen “might” have felt or “perhaps” have thought.

All that said, however, I enjoyed the detail that Weir goes into in telling what little is known about Isabella’s life. Weir certainly has a way with words, and she’s very good about bringing historical figures to life on the page. If you’re a newcomer to the history and politics of early-14th century England, I wouldn’t recommend this, however.

Also reviewed by: Jackets and Covers


S. Krishna said…
Thanks for the article about things authors shouldn't do on! It was really interesting.

I've heard that Alison Weir tends to show bias in her works. I've only read her historical fiction.
Meghan said…
I've found her to have some bias, but almost all historians do and some, particularly Victorian ones, will twist the facts at will to suit their particular hypothesis. We're trying to get away from this now, but as we're all human it's quite difficult; this sort of thing is especially tricky because we know so little about Isabella that it's very easy to balance the information one way or the other.

I read this book last year and I definitely felt the spin; the problem is we know very little and it's hard to disprove anything as unlikely as it seems. I've read several of Alison Weir's works and I think she suffers from not having had a full education in history, personally; she approaches things from a fresh perspective but she isn't always adding to the discussion because she hasn't read the beginnings of it, if you know what I mean. And I have read more entertaining "academic" works to be perfectly honest. I think this is the worst of hers that I have read.

Of course, I do appreciate her for bringing history to the masses and I do like reading her books, so take that with a grain of salt. I'm sorry for using your blog as a sounding point!

- medieval bookworm
Daphne said…
I read her Princes in the Tower and her treatment was very similar - only that it was so biased against Richard III that I believe I called it a "hatchet job". I'm sure every writer has bias for/against their subject to a certain extent, but there is still such a thing as balance (even if not entirely objective).
Ladytink_534 said…
I've thought about picking up her book The Lady Elizabeth but I might have to rethink that because I've found that when an author can't really remain impartial it hurts the book (whether fiction or non-fiction) for me.
Anonymous said…
Great review, and bias in biographies is definitely a huge issue. I remember reading one on Jane Austen, which I was fond of but a lot of "Austen-o-philes" loathe.
Laura said…
Have you read Weir's The Innocent Traitor? I've seen it around lots of book sales, but I don't know how good it is?
Anonymous said…
I have read Innocent Traitor and The Lady Elizabeth. Some parts of the stories overlap and it is interesting to see situations from Lady Jane Grey's point of view and Elizabeth's. Overall I found reading her books very enjoyable but as I do with all historical fiction, I did some of my own research to see what history actually shows about certain events. I think that is the best course to take.

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Forever Amber, by Kathleen Winsor

Pages: 972 Originally published: 1944 My edition: 2000 (Chicago Review Press) How I acquired my copy:, 2004

Forever Amber takes place in the 1660s, immediately follwing Charles II's ("the Merry Monarch") return of the Stuarts to the English throne. The book features Amber St. Claire, a young woman who starts out as a sixteen-year-old country girl, naieve to the workings of the world. She immediately meets Bruce Carlton, a dashing young Cavalier, with whom she has a passionate love affair in choppy intervals throughout the book. They have two children together, but Bruce won't marry her for the reason he tells his friend Lord Almsbury: that Amber just isn't the kind of woman one marries.

Upon following Bruce to London, he goes to Virginia, leaving her to fend for herself. What follows is a series of affairs and four marriages, with Bruce coming back from America now and then. Amber's marriages are imprudent: her first husband is a gambler, her second is…

Review: Jane Austen's Letters, ed. by Deirdre Le Faye

Pages: 667 Original date of publication: 2011 My copy: 2011 (Oxford University Press) Why I decided to read: How I acquired my copy:, April 2013
This is a compilation of many of Jane Austen’s letters, most of them sent to her sister Cassandra between 1796 and 1817, the year of her death. Although many of Austen’s letters were destroyed by her sister in order to preserve the family reputation, the collection contains over 160 letters in which Austen gives her sister details about her life in Chawton—as well as giving us a tantalizing glimpse of what was going through her mind as she was writing her novels (especially the novel that was to become Pride and Prejudice, First Impressions). There are other letters here, too, giving advice to her niece and professional correspondence to publishers—as well as a couple of letters that were written by Cassandra Austen after Jane’s death.
To the sisters, the letters acted in the way that phone calls do today; Austen’s news is all about pe…

Review: Midnight in Peking, by Paul French

Pages: 259 Original date of publication: 2013 My copy: 2013 (Penguin) Why I decided to read: How I acquired my copy: Phoenix bookstore, May 2013
In January 1937, the body of a young British girl, Pamela Werner, was found near Peking’s Fox Tower. Although two detectives, one British and the other Chinese, spent months on the case, the case was never solved completely, and the case was forgotten in the wake of the invasion of the Japanese. Frustrated, Pamela’s father, a former diplomat, tried to solve the crime. His investigation took him into the underbelly of Peking society and uncovered a secret that was worse than anything he could have imagined.
At first, I thought that this would be a pretty straightforward retelling of a true crime, but what Paul French (who spent seven years researching the story) reveals in this book is much more than that. Foreign society in Peking in the 1930s was stratified, with the British colonials at the top and the White Russian refugees at the bottom, but…