Skip to main content

Review: Queen Isabella, by Alison Weir


Queen Isabella: Treachery, Adultery, and Murder in Medieval England is a biography of the wife of Edward II. It’s actually a composite of things: a biography of Isabella’s most intimate household moments, drawn from her extensive household account books (want to know what was used as toilet paper in the English royal household? It’s in there), as well as an account of her relationship with her husband, his favorites, and her lover, Roger Mortimer.

My major problem with this book is Weir’s extreme bias in favor of Isabella. Weir even goes so far as to blame Edward entirely for the breakdown of the royal marriage and for Isabella’s changed demeanor during it. It’s almost as though the author went into the research and writing of this book thinking, “I’m going to vindicate Isabella.” This is a work of popular history, and as such, I feel that Weir could have been more impartial in her assessment of Isabella’s story. All that’s really known about Isabella’s day-to-day life comes from her book of household accounts, and Weir continually tries to make presumptions about how the queen “might” have felt or “perhaps” have thought.

All that said, however, I enjoyed the detail that Weir goes into in telling what little is known about Isabella’s life. Weir certainly has a way with words, and she’s very good about bringing historical figures to life on the page. If you’re a newcomer to the history and politics of early-14th century England, I wouldn’t recommend this, however.

Also reviewed by: Jackets and Covers

Comments

S. Krishna said…
Thanks for the article about things authors shouldn't do on Amazon.com! It was really interesting.

I've heard that Alison Weir tends to show bias in her works. I've only read her historical fiction.
Meghan said…
I've found her to have some bias, but almost all historians do and some, particularly Victorian ones, will twist the facts at will to suit their particular hypothesis. We're trying to get away from this now, but as we're all human it's quite difficult; this sort of thing is especially tricky because we know so little about Isabella that it's very easy to balance the information one way or the other.

I read this book last year and I definitely felt the spin; the problem is we know very little and it's hard to disprove anything as unlikely as it seems. I've read several of Alison Weir's works and I think she suffers from not having had a full education in history, personally; she approaches things from a fresh perspective but she isn't always adding to the discussion because she hasn't read the beginnings of it, if you know what I mean. And I have read more entertaining "academic" works to be perfectly honest. I think this is the worst of hers that I have read.

Of course, I do appreciate her for bringing history to the masses and I do like reading her books, so take that with a grain of salt. I'm sorry for using your blog as a sounding point!

- medieval bookworm
Daphne said…
I read her Princes in the Tower and her treatment was very similar - only that it was so biased against Richard III that I believe I called it a "hatchet job". I'm sure every writer has bias for/against their subject to a certain extent, but there is still such a thing as balance (even if not entirely objective).
Ladytink_534 said…
I've thought about picking up her book The Lady Elizabeth but I might have to rethink that because I've found that when an author can't really remain impartial it hurts the book (whether fiction or non-fiction) for me.
Anonymous said…
Great review, and bias in biographies is definitely a huge issue. I remember reading one on Jane Austen, which I was fond of but a lot of "Austen-o-philes" loathe.
Laura said…
Have you read Weir's The Innocent Traitor? I've seen it around lots of book sales, but I don't know how good it is?
Anonymous said…
I have read Innocent Traitor and The Lady Elizabeth. Some parts of the stories overlap and it is interesting to see situations from Lady Jane Grey's point of view and Elizabeth's. Overall I found reading her books very enjoyable but as I do with all historical fiction, I did some of my own research to see what history actually shows about certain events. I think that is the best course to take.

Popular posts from this blog

The Sunday Salon

What a crazy week this has been! My cousin, who’s ten, was in town for most of this past week, and since he’s high energy, it’s taken a lot of energy especially out of my mom, who also had to deal with my 87-year-old grandmother. Plus. my sister was in town for the weekend, so it’s been mostly crazy around here. All of my posts this past week have been scheduled; and I only got around to writing a bunch of outstanding reviews yesterday afternoon. It’s quieter here now that my mom has driven my sister back to New York, and I’ve spent much of today catching up on sleep and, of course, reading. Right now I’m reading one of my Virago Modern Classics: The Rising Tide, by Molly Keane (though it was originally published under her pseudonym MJ Farrell). I’m really loving it; the author really knew how to combine wonderful (sometimes exasperating) characters with a great plot. I’ve been cruising Ebay for more books by Molly Keane, since I’m living her writing style. This is easily one of the b…

Review: The Tudor Secret, by CW Gortner

Pages: 327Original date of publication:My edition: 2011 (St. Martin’s)Why I decided to read: Heard about this through Amazon.comHow I acquired my copy: Amazon Vine, December 2010Originally published as The Secret Lion, The Tudor Secret is the first in what will be a series featuring Brendan Prescott, an orphan foundling who was raised in the household of the Dudley family. In 1553, King Edward is on his deathbed, and William Cecil gives a secret mission Brendan. Soon he finds himself working as a double agent, as he attempts to discover the secret of his own birth.There ‘s a lot to like in this novel, mainly in the historical details that the author weaves into the story. He knows Tudor history like the back of his hand, and it definitely shows in this book. Because it was his first novel, however, there are some rough patches. There were a couple of plot holes that I had trouble navigating around—primarily, why would a secretive man such as Cecil entrust a seemingly nobody with this …

Review: Forever Amber, by Kathleen Winsor

Pages: 972 Originally published: 1944 My edition: 2000 (Chicago Review Press) How I acquired my copy: Amazon.com, 2004

Forever Amber takes place in the 1660s, immediately follwing Charles II's ("the Merry Monarch") return of the Stuarts to the English throne. The book features Amber St. Claire, a young woman who starts out as a sixteen-year-old country girl, naieve to the workings of the world. She immediately meets Bruce Carlton, a dashing young Cavalier, with whom she has a passionate love affair in choppy intervals throughout the book. They have two children together, but Bruce won't marry her for the reason he tells his friend Lord Almsbury: that Amber just isn't the kind of woman one marries.

Upon following Bruce to London, he goes to Virginia, leaving her to fend for herself. What follows is a series of affairs and four marriages, with Bruce coming back from America now and then. Amber's marriages are imprudent: her first husband is a gambler, her second is…