Skip to main content

Booking Through Thursday

I receive a lot of review books, but I have never once told lies about the book just because I got a free copy of it. However, some authors seem to feel that if they send you a copy of their book for free, you should give it a positive review.
Do you think reviewers are obligated to put up a good review of a book, even if they don’t like it? Have we come to a point where reviewers *need* to put up disclaimers to (hopefully) save themselves from being harassed by unhappy authors who get negative reviews?

I’m always honest about whether or not I like a book; the fact that it comes from the publisher or author really makes no difference to me. I don’t think that reviewer’s are obligated to post a good review of the book; and if an author expects a good review from someone, they’re entirely mistaken about the whole POINT of a review. And the point of a review is, to me, to help a reader make an educated decision about whether or not they’ll buy/ read a book. It may be perverse, but I always feel a bit satisfied when I post a negative review, and someone comments that my review has helped them decide to read the book and see for themselves. That said, however, I try not to totally trash a book (and certainly never its author), and to find at least one or two nice things to say about it.

With regards to the last question, with what’s been going on in the bookblogosphere lately, it’ll be a sad day when reviewers have to put up a disclaimer to save themselves from unhappy authors.


DeSeRt RoSe said…
I believe that a reviewer should be VERY honest and not lose his/her creditiability by writing +ve reviews if they don't like the book, because a lot of people depend on these reviews whether to read or not read the book, I'm one of them!
But the reviewer should not make his/her opinion the base for the review, I mean give a short summary about the book then give your opinion so readers would have a choice since they might not really share your taste for books :)
So being honest as you are I congratulate you and say continue doing what your doing and have fun doing it :)
Anonymous said…
I'm with you about the disclaimer issue. Why should we have a disclaimer if we're voicing honest opinion? After all, as long as the review is worded with dignity and respect, a negative review can be very constructive to the authors first and foremost and readers.

BTW, I think your negative review of one of the P&P spin-off is so spot on.

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Forever Amber, by Kathleen Winsor

Pages: 972 Originally published: 1944 My edition: 2000 (Chicago Review Press) How I acquired my copy:, 2004

Forever Amber takes place in the 1660s, immediately follwing Charles II's ("the Merry Monarch") return of the Stuarts to the English throne. The book features Amber St. Claire, a young woman who starts out as a sixteen-year-old country girl, naieve to the workings of the world. She immediately meets Bruce Carlton, a dashing young Cavalier, with whom she has a passionate love affair in choppy intervals throughout the book. They have two children together, but Bruce won't marry her for the reason he tells his friend Lord Almsbury: that Amber just isn't the kind of woman one marries.

Upon following Bruce to London, he goes to Virginia, leaving her to fend for herself. What follows is a series of affairs and four marriages, with Bruce coming back from America now and then. Amber's marriages are imprudent: her first husband is a gambler, her second is…

Review: Jane Austen's Letters, ed. by Deirdre Le Faye

Pages: 667 Original date of publication: 2011 My copy: 2011 (Oxford University Press) Why I decided to read: How I acquired my copy:, April 2013
This is a compilation of many of Jane Austen’s letters, most of them sent to her sister Cassandra between 1796 and 1817, the year of her death. Although many of Austen’s letters were destroyed by her sister in order to preserve the family reputation, the collection contains over 160 letters in which Austen gives her sister details about her life in Chawton—as well as giving us a tantalizing glimpse of what was going through her mind as she was writing her novels (especially the novel that was to become Pride and Prejudice, First Impressions). There are other letters here, too, giving advice to her niece and professional correspondence to publishers—as well as a couple of letters that were written by Cassandra Austen after Jane’s death.
To the sisters, the letters acted in the way that phone calls do today; Austen’s news is all about pe…

Review: Midnight in Peking, by Paul French

Pages: 259 Original date of publication: 2013 My copy: 2013 (Penguin) Why I decided to read: How I acquired my copy: Phoenix bookstore, May 2013
In January 1937, the body of a young British girl, Pamela Werner, was found near Peking’s Fox Tower. Although two detectives, one British and the other Chinese, spent months on the case, the case was never solved completely, and the case was forgotten in the wake of the invasion of the Japanese. Frustrated, Pamela’s father, a former diplomat, tried to solve the crime. His investigation took him into the underbelly of Peking society and uncovered a secret that was worse than anything he could have imagined.
At first, I thought that this would be a pretty straightforward retelling of a true crime, but what Paul French (who spent seven years researching the story) reveals in this book is much more than that. Foreign society in Peking in the 1930s was stratified, with the British colonials at the top and the White Russian refugees at the bottom, but…