Skip to main content

Review: Those Who Dream by Day, by Linda Cargill


I really struggled with what to write in this review. Actually, I struggled to come up with something positive to say, and came up with: the premise of the novel is promising--a thriller set around the sinking of the Lusitania and the Arabian revolts. While onboard the Lusitania, Dora Benley, a college junior and the daughter of a Pittsburgh tire magnate, encounters a mysterious man who demands that she return something she has apparently stolen. Later, the same man is found in the boiler room, tampering with a fuse. Later, Dora’s fiancĂ©e goes missing in the Arabian dessert. The premise is pretty much the only good thing about this novel.

On the surface, the book desperately needs a good proofreader and copyeditor, for grammar and consistency respectively. But all the proofreading and copyediting in the world aren't going to help this book with its bigger flaws. The writing style is descriptive in some parts, but then you’ll have periods of jerky movements where you feel as though something got cut out. The whole book actually feels like a first draft, with inconsistencies in detail throughout.

The characters are wooden, and the dialogue is stilted and a little anachonistic (did they really say things like, "yuck!" in 1919?). There were many times when something completely unlikely would happen—for example, a man would end up knifed in his back, and next thing you know, he’s up and walking like normal! Um, don’t people normally die or end up otherwise incapacitated if that happened? Then, there was this whole confusing scene on the Lusitania where the mysterious stranger performs something out of Tie Me Up, Tie Me Down, without the sex. Then, when Dora’s in captivity, in a cabin where apparently no one can hear her yell for help, she can hear (perfectly) the conversations of people walking past. Seriously, it was so bad I was laughing. And, the author's obsession with her alma mater was a little amateur and annoying.

Dora’s relationship with Edward Ware is completely forced and awkward, and seemed to be based entirely on sex (I’m sorry, getting engaged after knowing someone for only two days? Who does that?). Ditto on her relationship with Michael. For a girl who’s supposedly so intelligent, Dora seems to be a little bit dumb. The villain was a little dumb, too: when Michael comes to rescue Dora, he does so using a set of keys that the bad guy has conveniently left on the table. Earlier, the bad guy, chasing Dora and shooting at her with a gun, yells, “stop! Come back here!” Yeah, if someone with a gun was chasing me, the first thing I’d do is go back to them. In summary, then, this boook had an intriguing premise, but the writing wasn’t good enough to keep me reading past the first 150 pages or so. I used to work as an intern at a literary agency, and I would reject tons of manuscipts of books like this. I'm guessing that there's a fairly good reason for why this novel is self-published. Will be published in January.

Comments

Serena said…
Sounds like a tough read. I really hate when the hero or heroine is dumb and they are supposed to be smart...that's annoying. Editing...why is it being published...that would be so embarrassing to have that out there with my name on it.
Amanda said…
O that sucks! It sounds like such an interesting premise too.
Anonymous said…
Kudos to you for making it through the book, it certainly sounds like a tough one. Like Amanda said, it sounds like an interesting premise, and thanks for being honest.
Kristen M. said…
I feel like there are more new books lately that are in need of good editors. Of course, I would venture that the self-published novel might not have seen a professional editor at all.
Anna Claire said…
I once saw a glaring grammatical error on a jacket flap of a book I was thinking about getting, and just put it back. There are too many good books out there to waste time reading one that's sloppy. Thanks, Katherine, for doing the hard work so the rest of us won't have to!

Popular posts from this blog

Another giveaway

This time, the publicist at WW Norton sent me two copies of The Glass of Time , by Michael Cox--so I'm giving away the second copy. Cox is the author of The Meaning of Night, and this book is the follow-up to that. Leave a comment here to enter to win it! The deadline is next Sunday, 10/5/08.

A giveaway winner, and another giveaway

The winner of the Girl in a Blue Dress contest is... Anna, of Diary of An Eccentric ! My new contest is for a copy of The Shape of Mercy , by Susan Meissner. According to Publisher's Weekly : Meissner's newest novel is potentially life-changing, the kind of inspirational fiction that prompts readers to call up old friends, lost loves or fallen-away family members to tell them that all is forgiven and that life is too short for holding grudges. Achingly romantic, the novel features the legacy of Mercy Hayworth—a young woman convicted during the Salem witch trials—whose words reach out from the past to forever transform the lives of two present-day women. These book lovers—Abigail Boyles, elderly, bitter and frail, and Lauren Lars Durough, wealthy, earnest and young—become unlikely friends, drawn together over the untimely death of Mercy, whose precious diary is all that remains of her too short life. And what a diary! Mercy's words not only beguile but help Abigail and Lars...

Review: The Piano Teacher, by Janice Y.K. Lee

The Piano Teacher is a complicated novel. On the surface, it’s about a love affair between two British ex-patriots in Hong Kong in 1952-3. Claire Pendleton comes to Hong Kong with her husband Martin at a time when the world is still recovering from WWII; Claire takes up work as a piano teacher for the daughter of a wealthy Chinese family, where she meets Will Truesdale, the Chens’ enigmatic chauffeur. The book jumps back in time between the 1950s and the beginning of WWII, when Will is interned in Stanley, a Hong Kong camp for enemies of Japan. On “the outside” is Tudy Liang, Will’s beautiful Eurasian lover. There’s no doubt that Lee’s writing is beautiful. But there’s something lacking in this short, terse novel that I can’t quite put my finger on. First, I think it’s the tenses she uses when taking about each story: that which is set in the 1950s is in the past tense, while the war scenes are talked about in the present tense (confusing, no?) The interpersonal relationships of the m...