data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90866/908664747c4429dd2bbde3f0721e9d11a8273368" alt=""
Its in her favor that the author isn’t a professional historian; these royal affairs are related with a gossipy tone. However, there’s a caveat to this: some of Carroll’s facts are incorrect. She’s primarily a fiction writer, and she tries too hard at times to adopt the lingo—she’s fond of such terms as “heir and a spare” and “maitresse en titre.” It’s also difficult to credit an author who lists Michael Farquhar’s A Treasury of Royal Scandals as one of her sources. But nonetheless, its clear that Carroll must have done a lot of research in order to write this book, and that she’s really enthusiastic about her subject matter.
Comments